The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1123•Venola M. Johnson v. Louis F. Woodruff
06-1123Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1123
VENOLA M. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS F. WOODRUFF,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-cv-00272-BR)
Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Venola M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Louis F. Woodruff, Appellee
Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Venola M. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the
district court. Johnson v. Woodruff, No. 5:05-cv-00272-BR
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 29 & July 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.