Chander Kant v. Bregman, Berbert, Schwartz & Gilday, LLC

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1017
CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
BREGMAN, BERBERT, SCHWARTZ & GILDAY, LLC;
DANIEL RIGTERINK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-3433-WMN)
Submitted: May 26, 2006 Decided: June 13, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Geoffrey Townsend
Hervey, BREGMAN, BERBERT, SCHWARTZ & GILDAY, LLC, Bethesda,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Chander Kant and Ashima Kant appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on their civil action and denying their Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Kant v. Bregman, Berbert,
Schwartz & Gilday, LLC, No. CA-04-3433-WMN (D. Md. July 5, 2005;
Nov. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --