The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1015•Debbie L. Simpson v. United Parcel Service Company
06-1015Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 30, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1015
DEBBIE L. SIMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-05-1500-3)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 30, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Debbie L. Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Allison Viscardi Richardson,
ALSTON & BIRD, Atlanta, Georgia, Meredith S. Jeffries, ALSTON &
BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Debbie L. Simpson appeals a district court judgment and
order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
denying her motion for leave to file an amended complaint and
dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district
court. See Simpson v. United Parcel Serv. Co., No. CA-05-1500-3
(D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.