The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7954•057954.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7954
ALEXANDER O’BRIAN WILLIAMS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (CA-05-553-3)
Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 30, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander O’Brian Williams, Petersburg, Virginia, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alexander O’Brian Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals
from the district court’s order construing his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), as a successive motion under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Williams v. Adams, No. CA-05-553-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.