The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7901•057901.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7901
ISAAC EUGENE SLAPPY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden, Perry Correctional
Institution,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
A. L. BOWERS, Corporal; ROBERT MURRAY,
Captain,
Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-05-14-0-DCN)
Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Isaac Eugene Slappy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert E. Peterson, SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Isaac Eugene Slappy, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal
the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on
the reasoning of the district court that Slappy has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See
Slappy v. Bazzle, No. CA-05-14-0-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2005).
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.