The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7891•Charles A. Walker v. Greensville Corr. Ctr., No. CA-05-1066-1-CMH E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2005 . We deny…
05-7891Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 30, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7891
CHARLES A. WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREENSVILLE MEDICAL STAFF; NURSE NUNDY; NURSE
PECK; LIEUTENANT WOODSON, Building Supervisor;
K.D. RAE, Secretary,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-1066-1-CMH)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 30, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Walker appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Walker v. Greensville Corr. Ctr., No.
CA-05-1066-1-CMH (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2005). We deny Walker’s
pending motions to file a supplemental brief, for a “temporary” and
a “preliminary” restraining order, and for an injunction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.