The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7878•United States of America v. Fred Powell
05-7878Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 19, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7878
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FRED POWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CR-89-200)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 19, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fred Powell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Fred Powell, appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to quash his fine. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Powell, CR-89-200-01-G (M.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.