The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7870•Carlos Herman Salmeron v. Vanessa Adams
05-7870Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7870
CARLOS HERMAN SALMERON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VANESSA ADAMS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-531-3)
Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos Herman Salmeron, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Herman Salmeron, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Salmeron v. Adams, No. CA-05-
531-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 16 and Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.