The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7862•057862.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7862
CHARLES FRANKLIN HARGETT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MR. JACKSON; RON BELL; MS. DIAL; PAULA SMITH;
ROSEMARY JACKSON; PHILLIP E. STOVER,
Defendants - Appellees,
THEODIS BECK; BOYD BENNETT; BRENDA HARDEN;
SHIRLEY GREEN; JUDY FOGG; MS. BOYETTE; MS.
CARTER; GEORGE KENWORTHY; MR. HARRISON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-04-392-BO)
Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip
Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG,
L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Hargett v. Jackson, No. CA-04-392-BO (E.D.N.C.
Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.