The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7762•In re: Christopher R. Woodberry
05-7762Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 15, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7762
In Re: CHRISTOPHER R. WOODBERRY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CA-05-1440-4; CR-02-40)
Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: March 15, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher R. Woodberry, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Raphael Woodberry petitions for writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. He also requests
expedited consideration of his petition. We find there has been no
undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, while we grant
Woodberry’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in this court,
we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We deny Woodberry’s
motion for expedited consideration as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.