The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7755•United States of America v. Jerry L. Frierson
05-7755Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7755
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JERRY L. FRIERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-03-631)
Submitted: March 20, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry L. Frierson, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerry L. Frierson appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion to Correct Plain Error” in his criminal
judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Frierson, No. CR-03-631 (D.S.C. filed
Oct. 21, 2005; entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.