The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7738•United States of America v. Orville Isaac Wright
05-7738Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 17, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7738
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ORVILLE ISAAC WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-95-76-BR)
Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: July 17, 2006
Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orville Isaac Wright, Appellant Pro Se. John Stuart Bruce,
Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Orville Isaac Wright appeals the district court’s orders
denying his “Motion for Reduction of Term of Imprisonment ‘Nunc Pro
Tunc’” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Wright’s
motion for reduction of term of imprisonment for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Wright, No. CR-95-76-
BR (E.D.N.C. June 28, 2005). Moreover, the district court did not
abuse its discretion when it denied Wright’s motion for
reconsideration.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.