The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7707•057707.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7707
GEORGE RANDOLPH SUTTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. MEMMELAAR, Lieutenant, SBI Drug Detective;
MIKE K. HORSTMAN, SBI Drug Detective; JERRY
MOZINGO, IRS State Official; C. B. VICKORY,
District Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-05-257-BO)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 19, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Randolph Sutton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
George Sutton, Jr. appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his
subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sutton v.
Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2005); Sutton v.
Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.