The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7686•Jesus Eduardo Rosas-Zuloaga v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 2005
05-7686Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 29, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7686
JESUS EDUARDO ROSAS-ZULOAGA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-425-5)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesus Eduardo Rosas-Zuloaga, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*To the extent Rosas-Zuloaga may be seeking authorization
under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive
§ 2255 motion based on the rules announced in United States v.
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S.
296 (2004), we deny authorization.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jesus Eduardo Rosas-Zuloaga, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
ground that Zuloaga’s petition is properly charaterized as an
unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. *
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.