The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7644•United States of America v. James Edward Ellerbe
05-7644Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7644
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-97-100-BR)
Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 22, 2006
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Ellerbe, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel release of withheld discovery and his
case file. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court.
See United States v. Ellerbe, No. CR-97-100-BR (E.D.N.C. filed
Sept. 12, 2005 & entered Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.