The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7603•Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Department
05-7603Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 3, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7603
CHARLES FRANKLIN HARGETT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; J. W.
BOLES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-03-440-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Allan R. Gitter,
Bradley Owen Wood, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, P.L.L.C.,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-03-
440-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.