The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7495•Juan Valdez v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 2 - PER…
05-7495Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7495
JUAN VALDEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARRELL WATTS;
HARLEY G. LAPPIN; BOBBY SHEARIN; MICHAEL R.
MUIR; JEFFREY BANEY; JOHN SHOCKEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
04-2225-DKC)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Valdez, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United
States Attorney, James A. Frederick, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Juan Valdez appeals the district court’s order denying
his Bivens * action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Valdez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-
04-2225-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.