The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7414•United States of America v. Bryant Pierre Boone
05-7414Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 2, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7414
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BRYANT PIERRE BOONE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-21-A)
Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 2, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryant Pierre Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Bryant Pierre Boone appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Boone, No. CR-96-21-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.