Robert Earl Vance v. Phillip McCloud

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7406
ROBERT EARL VANCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PHILLIP MCCLOUD; RANDALL; PATRICIA WILLIAMS;
AMY ENLOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(CA-03-3515)
Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 2, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr.,
HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, P.A., Spartanburg, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Vance appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Vance v.
McCloud, No. CA-03-3515 (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --