The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7366•Ezekiel C. Cross, Jr v. Dominic Gutierrez
05-7366Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 19, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7366
EZEKIEL C. CROSS, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DOMINIC GUTIERREZ; BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,
District Judge. (CA-04-218)
Submitted: March 10, 2006 Decided: April 19, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ezekiel C. Cross, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ezekiel C. Cross, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as unnecessary Cross’
motion for a certificate of appealability, and we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Cross v. Gutierrez, No. CA-
04-218 (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.