The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7362•057362.U
*Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not
participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of
the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7362
JERRY L. CARY, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HONORABLE ALAN E. ROSENBLATT, Judge; HONORABLE
A. BONWILL SHOCKLEY, Judge; HONORABLE LEROY
ROUNTREE HASSELL, Chief Justice of the
Virginia Supreme Court; STEVEN WITMER,
Virginia Assistant Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-456-2)
Submitted: February 22, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before LUTTIG * and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry L. Cary, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerry L. Cary, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cary v.
Rosenblatt, No. CA-05-456-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2005). We deny
Cary’s motions for appointment of counsel, to amend the caption,
and to amend his claim. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.