The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7332•Larry M. Steele v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 412 F.3d 526 4th Cir. 2005 . Accordingly, we grant leave…
05-7332Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7332
LARRY M. STEELE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (CA-05-381-5)
Submitted: December 16, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry M. Steele, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Larry M. Steele, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error because the claim is foreclosed by our decision in Yi v.
Federal Bureau of Prisons, 412 F.3d 526 (4th Cir. 2005).
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm
the order of the district court. See Steele v. Stansberry, No.
CA-05-381-5 (E.D.N.C. July 27, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.