The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7321•Troy Luke Burks v. JOHN PATE, Acting Warden
05-7321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7321
TROY LUKE BURKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN PATE, Acting Warden; BETTY E. ALBRITTON,
Disciplinary Hearing Officer; P. FELDER, Unit
Sergeant; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-4014-3)
Submitted: April 17, 2006 Decided: April 28, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Luke Burks, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac McDuffie Stone, III,
Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES,
Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Troy Luke Burks appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burks v. Pate,
No. CA-02-4014-3 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 9,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.