The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7311•Vincent L. Barr v. G. THOMAS COOPER, JR., South Carolina Circuit Judge
05-7311Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 3, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7311
VINCENT L. BARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G. THOMAS COOPER, JR., South Carolina Circuit
Judge; J. ERNEST KINARD, JR., South Carolina
Circuit Judge; BARBARA SCOTT, Clerk of Court
for Richland County; VINCENT SMITH, Assistant
Solicitor; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney
General of South Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-05-1725-2)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 3, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent L. Barr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Vincent L. Barr appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barr v. Cooper,
No. CA-05-1725-2 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 5, 2005 & entered Aug. 8,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.