The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7278•McKinley David Littlejohn v. LARRY MOODY, Safety Manager
05-7278Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7278
MCKINLEY DAVID LITTLEJOHN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY MOODY, Safety Manager; MIKE GIBBS,
Electric Foreman; CHUCK LLOYD, Counselor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-330-2)
Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
McKinley David Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
McKinley Littlejohn, a federal inmate, appeals a district
court order dismissing his complaint alleging that three prison
officials were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety.
We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find
Littlejohn failed to state a claim of deliberate indifference. See
Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.