The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7273•United States of America v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CR-96-370
05-7273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 7, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7273
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT C. WOODSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-370)
Submitted: August 25, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert C. Woodson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert C. Woodson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis and his
subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Woodson, No. CR-96-370 (E.D. Va. filed May 31, 2005 & entered June
1, 2005; filed June 27, 2005 & entered June 28, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.