Efrain N. Cirineo v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 2005 , such a motion should be filed in the circuit in which he…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7257
EFRAIN N. CIRINEO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
VANESSA P. ADAMS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-05-385-2)
Submitted: December 19, 2005 Decided: January 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Efrain N. Cirineo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*To the extent Cirineo may be seeking authorization under 28
U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2000) motion on the basis of the rules announced in United
States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), such a motion should be
filed in the circuit in which he was sentenced.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Efrain N. Cirineo, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Cirineo v. Adams, No. CA-05-385-2 (E.D.
Va. July 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. *
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --