The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-7180•United States of America v. Mack Ray Little
05-7180Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7180
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MACK RAY LITTLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. William L. Osteen,
District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-92-27-BR)
Submitted: March 17, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mack Ray Little, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mack Ray Little appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(2000) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Little, No. CR-92-27-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.