The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6824•John Edward Stone v. JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections
05-6824Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6824
JOHN EDWARD STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina
Department of Corrections,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-04-21860-0)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Edward Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., John
Eric Kaufmann, MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, P.A., Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Edward Stone appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stone v. Ozmint,
No. CA-04-21860-0 (D.S.C. filed May 16, 2005 & entered May 17,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.