The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6823•United States of America v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CR-96-370-A
05-6823Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6823
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID LEE HILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-370-A)
Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 11, 2005
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Lee Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
David Lee Hill appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c) motion to amend a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)
motion in an action that has already been closed. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Hill, No. CR-96-370-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.