The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6821•Frederick W. Corbett v. State of North Carolina
05-6821Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6821
FREDERICK W. CORBETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RAYMOND SMITH, in his
official capacity as Superintendent of Caswell
Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-04-875-1)
Submitted: October 21, 2005 Decided: November 2, 2005
Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick W. Corbett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Frederick W. Corbett appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice Corbett’s Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Corbett v. North Carolina, No. CA-04-875-1 (M.D.N.C.
filed Apr. 22, 2005; entered Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.