The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6793•Jose Francisco Noesi v. B. A. Bledsoe
05-6793Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 5, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6793
JOSE FRANCISCO NOESI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. A. BLEDSOE; MICHAEL MCCLAIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
(CA-05-141-7-SGW)
Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 5, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Francisco Noesi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jose Francisco Noesi appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Bivens v. Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) complaint as frivolous under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Noesi v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-141-7-SGW
(W.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.