The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6782•Anthony Dye v. JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections
05-6782Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 7, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6782
ANTHONY DYE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina
Department of Corrections,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-04-22031-DCN)
Submitted: September 14, 2005 Decided: October 7, 2005
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Dye, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD,
PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Dye appeals the district court’s order accepting
the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Dye v. Ozmint, No. CA-04-
22031-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.