Bernard Gregory Lamp v. CAROLE WALLACE, Warden

05-6675Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 12, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6675
BERNARD GREGORY LAMP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAROLE WALLACE, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-04-317-3)
Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 12, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Gregory Lamp, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Gregory Lamp appeals the magistrate judge’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.*
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Lamp’s motion for appointment of counsel and
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Lamp v.
Wallace, No. CA-04-317-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 23 and Apr. 26, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.