The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6552•Charles E. Boyles, Jr v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The
05-6552Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 17, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6552
CHARLES E. BOYLES, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GENE JOHNSON,
Director of Prisons,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-05-75)
Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 17, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles E. Boyles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Boyles seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
order denying his motions for discovery and appointment of counsel.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Boyles seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Boyles’s
motion to note exception and/or objection and to request mediation,
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.