The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6544•Anthony Turner v. Raymond Iglecia, M.d
05-6544Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6544
ANTHONY TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RAYMOND IGLECIA, M.D.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. F. Bradford Stillman, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-00-917-2)
Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 6, 2005
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Turner, Appellant Pro Se. John Andrew Basham, Ted G.
Yoakam, Allison W. Anders, MCKENRY, DANCIGERS, WARNER, DAWSON &
LAKE, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Turner appeals the magistrate judge’s order*
granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and related state law claims alleging
deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and medical
malpractice. Our review of the record discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Turner v. Iglecia, No. CA-00-917-2 (E.D. Va.
Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.