The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6531•James Edward Lowe, Iii v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 3 - PER…
05-6531Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6531
JAMES EDWARD LOWE, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR SHAH, Medical Officer; DOCTOR GUZMAN,
Medical Officer; DOCTOR ALLEN, Clinical
Director; PA/MLP YIRGA, Physician Assistant;
PA/MLP HILLETEWORK, Physician Assistant;
PA/MLP OSORIO, Physician Assistant; DOCTOR
BHULLER,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JAMES M. BROOKS, Warden; HARLEY LAPPIN,
Regional Director Mid-Atlantic Region;
KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER, Director,
Defendants,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Party in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-03-1423-1)
Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: July 1, 2005
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Lowe, III, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c)
-- 2 of 3 --
*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Lowe, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lowe v. Shah,
No. CA-03-1423-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.