The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6519•United States of America v. Defavry Travek Gantt
05-6519Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 5, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6519
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DEFAVRY TRAVEK GANTT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-01-880; CA-04-2472)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 5, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Defavry Travek Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Defavry Travek Gantt appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for an extension of time in which to note an
appeal from the underlying order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2000) motion. Our review of the record including the
opinion of the district court discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Gantt’s motion for a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.