The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6479•Leo Rites v. Maryland House of Correction Annex
05-6479Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6479
LEO RITES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION ANNEX; WARDEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-
4030-1-AMD)
Submitted: September 28, 2005 Decided: October 25, 2005
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leo Rites, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Leo Rites appeals the district court’s order denying his
request for injunctive relief. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Rites v. Maryland House of
Correction Annex, No. CA-04-4030-1-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 11, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.