The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6463•Joseph J. Schepis, Jr v. MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, Warden
05-6463Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6463
JOSEPH J. SCHEPIS, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court of South Carolina, at
Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-04-
21977-0-17BD)
Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: July 1, 2005
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Schepis v. Hamidullah, No. CA-04-21977-0-17BD
(D.S.C. filed Jan. 13 & entered Jan. 18, 2005). We deny Schepis’
motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.