The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6462•Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr v. North Carolina Department of Correction
05-6462Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 4, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6462
ROBERT ANDREW BARTLETT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION;
THEODIS BECK; BOYD BENNETT; ROBY C. LEE; TONY
SANDERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-04-576-5-BO)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 4, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bartlett v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-
576-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.