The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6445•Jamie Lamont Miles v. WELLS, Doctor/Dentist
05-6445Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 26, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6445
JAMIE LAMONT MILES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WELLS, Doctor/Dentist; MAYHUE, Doctor/Dentist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-98-2)
Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 26, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamie Lamont Miles, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jamie Lamont Miles appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice
for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. “No action shall
be brought with respect to prison conditions under section
1983 . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other
correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are
available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). We find no
abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal of the
complaint without prejudice to allow Miles an opportunity to
exhaust his administrative remedies, as required by § 1997e(a).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.