The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6336•John Frederick Ballentine v. Virginia Parole Board
05-6336Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 24, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6336
JOHN FREDERICK BALLENTINE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-537-3)
Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 24, 2005
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Frederick Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Frederick Ballentine appeals the district court’s
order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and a subsequent order
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Ballentine v.
Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA-04-537-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2004 & Jan.
26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.