The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6282•Sebastian X. Moore v. ELIZABETH COLEMAN GRAY, North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services
05-6282Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 16, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6282
SEBASTIAN X. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ELIZABETH COLEMAN GRAY, North Carolina
Prisoner Legal Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-918-5)
Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 16, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sebastian X. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sebastian X. Moore appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint
alleging that counsel failed to recognize appealable issues and
refused to represent him. We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Gray, No. CA-04-918-
5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.