Robert Frost, Jr v. MIKE D. ILLES, Administrator, in his official capacity

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6268
ROBERT FROST, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MIKE D. ILLES, Administrator, in his official
capacity and Individual capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 05-6643
ROBERT FROST, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MIKE D. ILLES, Administrator, in his official
capacity and Individual capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-943-8-17BI; CA-04-943-8-JFA)
Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Frost, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II,
WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Robert Frost, Jr., appeals
the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Frost v. Illes, Nos. CA-04-943-8-17BI; CA-04-
943-8-JFA (D.S.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 & entered Feb. 8, 2005;
Mar. 23, 2005). We deny Frost’s motion for relief from judgment
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --