The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6255•Jimmy Locklear v. PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden
05-6255Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6255
JIMMY LOCKLEAR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-936)
Submitted: September 30, 2005 Decided: October 21, 2005
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Locklear appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-936 (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.