The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6188•Mario Howard Lloyd v. United States of America
05-6188Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 3, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6188
MARIO HOWARD LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HENRY LUSK, Food Administrator,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(CA-02-3291-2-27-AJ)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 3, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mario Howard Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Christie Newman, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Mario Howard Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge,
granting summary judgment to Defendants, and dismissing his claims
filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1982). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Lloyd v. United States, No. CA-02-3291-2-27-AJ (D.S.C. filed
Jan. 7, 2005 & entered Jan. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.