The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6179•Charles L. Lewis v. HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman
05-6179Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 15, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6179
CHARLES L. LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman, and in her own
individual capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-05-43)
Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 15, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Lewis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Lewis v. Fahey, No. CA-05-43 (E.D. Va. Jan.
25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.