The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6154•Larry Lamont Bush v. JOHN H. PRICE, Warden
05-6154Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 19, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6154
LARRY LAMONT BUSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN H. PRICE, Warden; WILLIAM BRITTON, Case
Manager; MARY CHAPLIN-COLE, Case Manager; M.
STOUFFER, Warden; K. HOFFMAN, Case Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
2264-AMD)
Submitted: June 24, 2005 Decided: August 19, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Larry Lamont Bush appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bush v.
Price, No. CA-03-2264-AMD (D. Md. filed Jan. 13; entered Jan. 14,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.