United States of America v. Troy Rolle

05-6149Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 6, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6149
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TROY ROLLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-97-608)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 6, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Rolle, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Troy Rolle appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(West 2000 & Supp. 2004) and his motion to reconsider. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United
States v. Rolle, No. CR-97-608 (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2005). Accordingly,
we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.